苯磺酸瑞马唑仑复合艾司氯胺酮在高血压患者门诊肠镜检查中的应用

Application of remimazolam besylate combined with esketamine in outpatient colonoscopy in patients with hypertension

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨苯磺酸瑞马唑仑复合艾司氯胺酮在高血压患者门诊肠镜检查(肠治疗)中的疗效和安全性。方法 选取2023年在鄂尔多斯市中心医院接受门诊肠治疗的高血压患者48例,序贯给予2 %利多卡因0.5 mg/kg、艾司氯胺酮0.15 mg/kg,再分别给予苯磺酸瑞马唑仑0.15~0.25 mg/kg(R组)或丙泊酚1~2 mg/kg(P组)诱导,泵注1~2 mg/(kg·h)苯磺酸瑞马唑仑(R组)或2~4 mg/(kg·h)丙泊酚(P组)维持镇静。观察并比较2组患者平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)、脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)、围术期时间指标(诱导时间、操作时间、苏醒时间、出院时间)、镇静指标脑电双频指数(BIS)、改良警觉/镇静评分(MOAA/S评分)及Ramsay镇静评分等差异,并记录不良事件。结果 在肠治疗术后5 min(T6),R组MAP高于P组(95.7±2.8)mmHg vs.(92.5±3.0)mmHg,P < 0.05,肠治疗开始至结束即刻(T3~T5),R组HR、RR、心肌耗氧量、BIS值均高于P组(均P < 0.05),但以上指标均保持在正常范围内;此外,R组围术期最低SpO2高于P组(96.1±2.0)% vs.(94.0±2.4)%,P < 0.05,术后恢复质量评分高于P组(144.0±3.5)分vs.(140.9±3.8)分,P < 0.05,注射痛发生率低于P组(0% vs.23.1 %,P < 0.05);但R组诱导时间(14.4±2.4)s vs.(8.8±1.5)s和苏醒时间(4.4±1.2)s vs.(3.7±1.1)s均延长(均P < 0.05)。2组诱导成功率差异无统计学意义(90.9% vs. 96.2%,P > 0.05)。结论 高血压患者门诊肠治疗中,苯磺酸瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚在复合艾司氯胺酮后疗效相似,但注射痛更轻,血流动力学更稳定,可作为高血压患者肠治疗更优方案。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate combined with esketamine in outpatient colonoscopy in patients with hypertension. Methods A total of 48 hypertensive patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy at the Ordos Central Hospital in 2023 were enrolled. The patients sequentially received 2% lidocaine 0.5 mg/kg and esketamine 0.15 mg/kg,followed by either remimazolam besylate 0.15-0.25 mg/kg(R group)or propofol 1-2 mg/kg(P group)for induction. Continuous infusion of remimazolam besylate at 1-2 mg/(kg·h)(R group)or propofol at 2-4 mg/(kg·h)(P group)was administered to maintain sedation. Differences between the two groups were observed and compared in terms of mean arterial pressure(MAP),heart rate(HR),respiratory rate(RR),and pulse oxygen saturation(SpO2),perioperative time indicators(induction time,operation time,resuscitation time and discharge time),and sedation indicators bispectral index(BIS),the Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation(MOAA/S)score,and the Ramsay sedation score. Adverse events were also recorded. Results At 5 minutes after colonoscopy(T6),the MAP in the R group was higher than that in the P group (95.7±2.8)mmHg vs.(92.5±3.0)mmHg,P < 0.05. From the beginning to the end of the procedure(T3-T5),HR,RR,myocardial oxygen consumption,and BIS values were also higher in the R group(all P < 0.05)and all the above indicators remain within the normal range. Moreover,the R group perioperative minimum SpO2 is significantly higher than that of P group (96.1±2.0)% vs.(94.0±2.4)%,P < 0.05,and postoperative recovery quality score is higher than P group(144.0±3.5)vs.(140.9±3.8),P < 0.05,the rate of injection pain in R group is lower than P group(0% vs. 23.1 %,P < 0.05). However,the induction (4.4±1.2)s vs.(3.7±1.1)s and resuscitation times (4.4±1.2)s vs.(3.7±1.1)s were prolonged in the R group(both P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the success rate of induction between the two groups(90.9% vs. 96.2%,P > 0.05). Conclusions In outpatient colonoscopy for patients with hypertension,remimazolam besylate and propofol,when combined with esketamine,provide comparable sedative efficacy. However,remimazolam besylate is associated with less injection pain and more stable hemodynamics,suggesting it may serve as a preferable option in this population.

     

/

返回文章
返回