罗哌卡因头皮神经阻滞对开颅手术患者术后恢复质量的影响

Effect of ropivacaine scalp nerve block on postoperative recovery quality after craniotomy

  • 摘要: 目的 评价0.5%罗哌卡因用于头皮神经阻滞对开颅手术患者疼痛以及术后恢复质量的影响,为临床优化麻醉方案提供参考依据。方法 选择择期全身麻醉下行开颅手术患者66例,按1∶1随机分为罗哌卡因组(R组)和空白对照组(C组),R组于麻醉诱导后用0.5%罗哌卡因行双侧头皮神经阻滞,C组不用罗哌卡因行头皮神经阻滞。主要结局指标为患者术后6 h视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。次要结局指标为术后24、48、72 h的VAS评分;术中瑞芬太尼的用量;手术重要节点(上头钉前、上头钉、切皮前、切皮、拔管前、拔管后各时间节点)的平均动脉压与心率;术后镇痛补救率;术后恶心呕吐、低血压、发热、肺炎、癫痫、深静脉血栓、褥疮发生率;术后首次进食时间、首次下床活动时间、术后住院时长;术前与术后24 h焦虑、抑郁、睡眠评分。结果 根据纳排标准,最终纳入患者61例,其中R组30例,C组31例。与C组相比,R组患者术后6 h和24 h的VAS评分明显降低(均P < 0.05),术后48 h、72 h的VAS评分2组比较差异没有统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。与C组相比,R组术中瑞芬太尼用量减少(P < 0.05),术后镇痛补救率降低(P < 0.05)。R组在上头钉、切皮、拔管前3个时间点平均动脉压低于C组(P < 0.05),在上头钉时心率低于C组(P < 0.05)。R组患者术后首次进食时间及术后下床活动时间均早于C组(P < 0.05),住院时长短于C组(P < 0.05)。2组在术后恶心呕吐、低血压、发热、癫痫、肺炎、下肢血栓、褥疮等发生率比较差异无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。与术前相比,R组患者术后24 h的焦虑自评量表、抑郁自评量表评分降低(P < 0.05),C组患者术后24 h的匹兹堡睡眠质量指数评分升高(P < 0.05)。结论 术前采用0.5%罗哌卡因行头皮神经阻滞能安全有效减轻围术期疼痛,减少阿片类药物用量及心血管应激反应,改善开颅手术患者的焦虑抑郁、首次进食时间及活动时间、住院时长等术后恢复质量相关指标,对促进开颅手术患者早期康复有积极意义。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of 0.5% ropivacaine for scalp nerve block on postoperative pain and recovery quality in craniotomy patients, and provide a reference for optimizing clinical anesthesia plans. Methods Sixty-six patients scheduled for craniotomy under general anesthesia were selected and randomly divided into ropivacaine group (R group) and control group (C group) in a 1∶1 ratio. The R group received bilateral scalp nerve blocks with 0.5% ropivacaine after anesthesia induction, while the C group was not treated. The primary outcome was the postoperative 6-hour Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score. Secondary outcomes included VAS scores at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively; remifentanil dosage during surgery; mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) at key surgical time points, including before nailing, during nailing, before skin incision, during skin incision, before extubation, and after extubation; postoperative analgesic rescue rate; incidence of postoperative complications; incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, hypotension, fever, pneumonia, epilepsy, deep vein thrombosis, and pressure sores; time to first postoperative meal and ambulation; hospital stay length; and the scores of anxiety, depression, and sleep preoperatively and postoperative 24-hour. Results Sixty-one patients were finally included, with 30 in the R group and 31 in the C group. Compared to the C group, the R group had significantly lower VAS scores at 6 and 24 hours postoperatively (all P < 0.05), but no significant difference at 48 and 72 hours (all P > 0.05). The R group had lower remifentanil dosage (P < 0.05), lower analgesic rescue rate (P <0.05), lower MAP at three time points (before nailing, before skin incision, before extubation), and lower HR during nailing (all P < 0.05). The R group also had earlier time to first meal and ambulation, and shorter hospital stay (all P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in postoperative nausea and vomiting, hypotension, fever, epilepsy, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, and pressure sores between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The R group had lower anxiety and depression scores at 24 hours postoperatively compared to preoperatively (P < 0.05), while the C group had higher Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores (P < 0.05). Conclusions Preoperative scalp nerve block with 0.5% ropivacaine can effectively relieve perioperative pain, reduce opioid use and cardiovascular stress response, and improve postoperative recovery quality in craniotomy patients, including anxiety, depression, time to first meal and ambulation, and hospital stay length, promoting the early rehabilitation of craniotomy patients.

     

/

返回文章
返回