抑郁症状对双相障碍患者生活质量的影响路径分析

Pathway analysis of the impact of depressive symptoms on quality of life in patients with bipolar disorder

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨抑郁症状对双相障碍患者生活质量的影响及其中介心理因素。
    方法 采用便利抽样法,选择2019年4月至2025年9月在中山大学附属第三医院、广州医科大学附属脑科医院、厦门市仙岳医院精神科门诊及住院部就诊的双相障碍患者235例,以及广州市中山二路社区、冠军社区的健康人群68名,使用一般资料调查表、汉密尔顿抑郁量表-17、杨氏躁狂状态评定量表、神经认知功能测试、双相障碍心理弹性量表、罗森伯格自尊量表、功能评估短期测试量表及健康调查12条简表进行调查。运用Pearson相关性分析、多元线性回归分析等方法分析数据,构建中介效应模型并进行检验。
    结果 生活质量生理成分总分(r = −0.298,P < 0.001)、心理成分总分(r = −0.422,P < 0.001)均与抑郁症状得分呈负相关关系;生活质量心理成分总分还与自尊得分(r = −0.321,P < 0.001)呈负相关关系,而与心理弹性得分(r = 0.158,P = 0.026)呈正相关关系。进一步回归分析显示,抑郁症状越严重(t = −3.571,P < 0.001)、年龄越大(t = −3.088,P = 0.002)、整体社会功能的认知功能维度损害越严重(t = −2.696,P = 0.008),生活质量生理成分越差;抑郁症状越严重(t = −3.992,P < 0.001)、自尊水平越高(t = −3.439,P = 0.001)、整体社会功能的人际关系维度损害越严重(t = −2.830,P = 0.005)、生活质量生理成分越好(t = −2.579,P = 0.011)、教育程度越高(t = −2.268,P = 0.024),生活质量心理成分越差。中介效应模型显示,抑郁症状可直接预测生活质量心理成分(β = −0.317),且能通过自尊(β = −0.081)、心理弹性(β = −0.022)、自尊和心理弹性(β = −0.028)这3条路径对生活质量心理成分产生影响。
    结论 抑郁症状对双相障碍患者生活质量心理成分有直接影响,还可通过自尊的中介作用、心理弹性的中介作用、自尊和心理弹性的链式中介作用间接产生影响。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the impact of depressive symptoms on quality of life in patients with bipolar disorder and the mediating psychological factors involved.
    Methods Using convenience sampling, 235 patients with bipolar disorder who visited outpatient clinics and inpatient wards of the Departments of Psychiatry at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, and Xiamen Xian Yue Hospital from April 2019 to September 2025 were enrolled, along with 68 healthy individuals from the Zhongshan 2nd Road Community and the Guanjun Community in Guangzhou. Participants were assessed using a general information questionnaire, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HDRS-17), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), neurocognitive function tests, the Resilience Questionnaire for Bipolar Disorder (RBD), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) and the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). Pearson correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were performed, and a mediation effect model was constructed and tested.
    Results Both the SF-12 physical component summary (PCS-12) score (r = −0.298, P < 0.001) and the mental component summary (MCS-12) score (r = −0.422, P < 0.001) of quality of life were negatively correlated with depressive symptoms score. The MCS-12 score of quality of life was also negatively correlated with self-esteem score (r = −0.321, P < 0.001) and positively correlated with resilience scores (r = 0.158, P = 0.026). Further regression analyses showed that more severe depressive symptoms (t = −3.571, P < 0.001), older age (t = −3.088, P = 0.002), and greater impairment in the cognitive functioning dimension of psychosocial functioning (t = −2.696, P = 0.008) were associated with poorer quality of life in the physical component. More severe depressive symptoms (t = −3.992, P < 0.001), higher self-esteem level (t = −3.439, P = 0.001), greater impairment in the interpersonal relationships dimension of psychosocial functioning (t = −2.830, P = 0.005), better quality of life in the physical component (t = −2.579, P = 0.011), and higher educational level (t = −2.268, P = 0.024) were associated with poorer quality of life in the mental component. The mediating effect model indicated that depressive symptoms could directly predict the MCS-12 (β = −0.317) and could also influence it through three pathways: self-esteem (β = −0.081), resilience (β = −0.022), and a chain mediation pathway involving self-esteem and resilience (β = −0.028).
    Conclusion  Depressive symptoms have a direct impact on the mental component of quality of life in patients with bipolar disorder and also exert indirect effects through the mediating role of self-esteem, the mediating role of resilience, and the chain mediating effects of self-esteem and resilience.

     

/

返回文章
返回