肩关节脱位急诊旋转复位角度与两种固定法效果分析

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨急诊肩关节脱位旋转复位法复位角度,并比较内旋与外旋两种固定法的效果。方法:急诊成功复位肩关节脱位93例,测量肩关节脱位旋转复位法成功复位时肩关节角度,统计复位时旋转角度范围,随机分两组采用内收内旋法与内收外旋法固定,记录伤后一年肩关节功能测定结果及随访复发情况。结果:肩关节脱位旋转复位法复位角度范围平均为内收20?±3?、内旋24?±15?、前屈34?±3?。内旋固定法术后复发率29%,外旋固定法术后复发率14%(P<0.05)。关节功能肘关节评分、上肢、肩、手功能障碍(DASH)调查量表评分两组差异无统计学意义。结论:急诊肩关节脱位复位外旋固定法较内旋固定复发率更低且利于关节功能恢复。旋转复位角度范围对急诊手法复位有指导性意义。

     

    Abstract: Objective: To study rotation angle and compare with the effect of two immobilization methods of shoulder dislocation reduction.Methods: This was a retrospective study from January 2004 to August in 2009 for 93 patients with shoulder dislocation and treated in emergency departments. We measured the rotation angle of success reduction. Two methods for adduction immobilization(external and internal rotation) were used and results of shoulder function and recurrence rates were analyzed. Results: We found the rotation angle of success reduction were adduction about 20±3?, internal rotation about 24±15?;anteflexion about 34±3?.Recurrence rate of internal and external immobilization was 28.6%,13.5%,respectively(P<0.05). There was not statistically significant for Joint function DASH score in two groups.Conclusion:. External rotation immobilization may be more effective for Joint function recovery and less recur than internal’s for shoulder dislocation treatment in emergency departments. The scope of rotation angles of reduction has value to reduction methods.

     

/

返回文章
返回