米氮平治疗顽固性功能性消化不良伴抑郁患者的疗效及安全性
-
摘要: 目的:评价米氮平在顽固性功能性消化不良(FD)伴抑郁障碍患者中的治疗地位及其安全性。方法:将75例顽固性FD伴抑郁病例患者随机分为米氮平组、帕罗西丁组和对照组各25例。对照组使用FD的常规治疗,治疗组则在对照组治疗基础上分别加用米氮平15~45 mg/d或帕罗西丁10~30 mg/d,疗程共6周。观察3组FD症状、抑郁程度的改善情况及不良反应情况,并比较3组疗效。结果:①米氮平治疗6周后患者的消化不良症状有明显改善,米氮平组、帕罗西丁组和对照组FD症状量表评分分别为4.0±1.2、6.7±1.7、8.7±2.6,比较差异均具可比性,P均<0.05。②米氮平治疗6周后患者的抑郁症状有明显改善,米氮平组、帕罗西丁组和对照组的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分分别为7±3、8±3、20±5, 米氮平组与帕罗西丁组比较差异无统计学意义,但此两组与对照组比较差异具统计学意义,P均<0.05。③米氮平组的主要不良反应是眩晕、头昏(16%)、体质量增加(16%)、疲乏(8%)和嗜睡(8%),上述不良反应均轻微,无需特殊处理。未发现其它有临床意义的实验室检查异常及阳性体征。结论:米氮平在抗抑郁的情况下亦有助于缓解上消化道症状,为治疗顽固性FD伴抑郁安全有效的药物。Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Mirtazapine in treatment for resistant functional dyspepsia with depression. Methods: Seventy-five FD patients with depression were randomly assigned to receive mirtazapine、paroxetine or regular treatment for 6 weeks. The therapeutic efficacy was evaluated by dyspepsia symptom judgment and the Hamilton depression scale (HAMD). The safety was assessed by adverse effects. Results: ①At the end of 6th week , there is significant difference in the scores of dyspepsia syndrome among three groups . ②There is significant difference in the scores of HAMD between mirtazapine group and control group. But There is no significant difference in the scores of HAMD between mirtazapine group and paroxetine group.③The adverse effects associated with mirtazapine was dizzy(16%)、body weight increased (16%)、fatigue(8%)、lethargy(8%) .The adverse effects are mild and need no treatment. Conclusion: Mirtazapine can improve integrative symptoms of FD patients with the treatment of antidepression, it is effective and safe in treatment for resistant functional dyspepsia with depression.
下载: