动态关节松动术治疗肱骨外上髁炎的初步研究

  • 摘要: 目的:初步探讨动态关节松动术(MWM)治疗肱骨外上髁炎的短期疗效。方法:将27例肱骨外上髁炎患者随机分为MWM组(15例)和对照组(12例)。MWM组予单次MWM治疗,对照组予传统物理治疗—单次超短波和超声波治疗。检测两组治疗前后的患侧无痛握力及健、患侧最大握力,取其比值(无痛握力患侧/最大握力健侧、最大握力患侧/最大握力健侧)作为参数进行两组比较。并比较两组治疗前后患肢的的视觉模拟评分(VAS)。结果:MWM组患者治疗后的无痛握力患侧/最大握力健侧较治疗前显著提高(0.80±0.18对比0.55±0.20,P<0.05),也明显高于治疗后的对照组(0.80±0.18对比0.58±0.18,P<0.05)。MWM组治疗后VAS 明显低于对照组(3.25±1.09对比4.29±0.61,P<0.05)。结论:MWM可快速缓解肱骨外上髁炎的疼痛,有效改善握力。

     

    Abstract: Objective: To investigate the short-term effect of mobilization with movement(MWM) in Patients with lateral epicondylalgia. Method: Twenty seven subjects with lateral epicondylalgia were enrolled and were divided into MWM group(15 cases) and control group(12 cases). The patients of MWM group were treated with single MWM only once, and the patients of control group were treated with ultrashort wave (USW) and ultrasonic wave only once. Pain-free grip strength(PFG) and maximum grip strength(MGS) were measured before and after a single intervention.The visual analogue scales(VAS) before and after these treatment were also recorded for the suffering limbs.Result:In the MWM group,the PFG affected /MGS unaffected after the MWM was much higher than that before the MWM(0.80±0.18 vs. 0.55±0.20,P<0.05), while it was much higher than that in the traditional physiotherapy treatment group(0.80±0.18 vs. 0.58±0.18,P<0.05). The VAS after MWM was much lower than that after the traditional physiotherapy treatment(3.25±1.09 vs. 4.29±0.61,P<0.05).Conclusion:MWM is a promising intervention modality for the treatment of patients with Lateral Epicondylalgia. It is effective in reducing pain, increasing active range of motion and promoting strength, and was worth of popularizing in the out-patient rehabilitation for the patients with lateral epicondylalgia .The underlying working mechanism needs more research.

     

/

返回文章
返回