PDF(1294 KB)
PDF(1294 KB)
PDF(1294 KB)
同期或分期处理子宫纵隔合并子宫肌瘤对生殖内分泌与转归影响
Effect of simultaneous or staged management of uterine septum complicated with uterine fibroids on reproductive endocrinology and prognosis
目的 探讨宫腔镜子宫纵隔切除术(TCRS)同期或分期处理子宫肌瘤效果及其对生殖内分泌和转归影响。方法 收集87例纵隔子宫伴子宫肌瘤患者的临床资料,根据手术方法不同分为同期组43例和分期组44例。同期组行同期宫腔镜TCRS和子宫肌瘤切除术(TCRM),分期组行分期宫腔镜TCRS和TCRM。比较2组的手术情况、术后子宫肌层愈合情况、子宫内膜及子宫内膜下血流参数[血流指数(FI)、血管化血流指数(VFI)、血管化指数(VI)]、子宫内膜厚度、生殖内分泌指标[雌二醇(E2)、黄体生成素(LH)、卵泡刺激素(FSH)]、生殖转归及并发症。结果 2组均成功完成手术。同期组的手术时间、下床活动时间、住院时间均短于分期组(P均< 0.05);同期组术后1个月子宫肌层愈合患者占比高于分期组(P < 0.05);2组术前和术后1、3个月子宫内膜及子宫内膜下血流参数、子宫内膜厚度、生殖内分泌指标比较差异均无统计学意义(P均> 0.05);同期组术后6个月妊娠患者占比高于分期组(P < 0.05);2组并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论 TCRS同期处理子宫肌瘤不影响子宫内膜血流动力学、子宫内膜容受性、卵巢储备功能及生殖内分泌功能,且可缩短手术时间、下床活动及住院时间,有利于术后妊娠,具有一定安全性。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of simultaneous or staged management of uterine fibroids by transcervical resection of septum (TCRS), reproductive endocrinology and clinical prognosis. Methods Clinical data of 87 patients with uterine septum complicated with uterine fibroids were collected. All patients were divided into the simultaneous (n = 43) and staged groups (n = 44) according to different surgical methods. In the simultaneous group, hysteroscopic TCRS and transcervical resection of myoma (TCRM) were performed simultaneously, whereas staged hysteroscopic TCRS and TCRM were conducted in the staged group. Surgical conditions, postoperative myometrial healing, endometrial and subendometrial blood flow parameters (flow index (FI), vascularization flow index (VFI) and vascularization index (VI)), endometrial thickness, reproductive endocrine indexes (luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol (E2)), reproductive outcomes and complications were compared between two groups. Results All patients in both groups completed the surgery successfully. The operation time, time to the first off-bed activity and the length of hospital stay in the simultaneous group were shorter than those in the staged group (all P < 0.05). In the simultaneous group, the proportion of patients with myometrial healing at 1 month after surgery was higher than that in the staged group (P < 0.05). The differences in subendometrial VFI, FI, VI, endometrial thickness and E2, LH and FSH levels before surgery, 1 month and 3 months after surgery were not statistically significant between two groups (all P > 0.05). The percentage of patients who were pregnant at postoperative 6 months in the simultaneous group was higher than that in the staged group (P < 0.05). The difference in the incidence of complication was not statistically significant between two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions Simultaneous management of uterine fibroids by TCRS does not affect endometrial hemodynamics, endometrial tolerance, ovarian reserve function and reproductive endocrine function. In addition, it can shorten the operation time, time to the first off-bed activity and length of hospital stay, which is conducive to postoperative pregnancy and has a certain degree of safety.
宫腔镜 / 子宫肌瘤 / 纵隔子宫 / 子宫纵隔切除术 / 子宫肌瘤切除术 / 妊娠 / 子宫内膜 {{custom_keyword}} /
Hysteroscopy / Uterine fibroids / Uterine septum / Resection of uterine septum / Myomectomy / Pregnancy / Endometrium {{custom_keyword}} /
表1 2组纵隔子宫伴子宫肌瘤患者的基线资料比较Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between two groups of patients with mediastinal uterus and uterine fibroids |
| 组 别 | n | 年龄/岁 | BMI/(kg/m2) | 纵隔子宫分型/n(%) | 肌瘤数目/n(%) | 肌瘤直径/cm | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 完全型 | 不完全型 | 单发 | 多发 | ||||||
| 同期组 | 43 | 30.21±4.74 | 23.47±0.54 | 12(28) | 31(72) | 27(63) | 16(37) | 4.21±1.09 | |
| 分期组 | 44 | 30.72±4.27 | 23.62±0.49 | 16(36) | 28(64) | 29(66) | 15(34) | 4.18±1.11 | |
| t/χ 2值 | 0.528 | 1.357 | 0.713 | 0.092 | 0.127 | ||||
| P值 | 0.599 | 0.178 | 0.399 | 0.761 | 0.899 | ||||
表2 2组纵隔子宫伴子宫肌瘤患者的手术情况比较Table 2 Comparison of surgical outcomes between two groups of patients with mediastinal uterus and uterine fibroids( |
| 组 别 | n | 手术时间/min | 术中出血量/mL | 肛门排气时间/h | 下床活动时间/h | 住院时间/d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 同期组 | 43 | 80.44±22.68 | 58.35±17.76 | 18.77±5.23 | 30.50±6.94 | 4.25±0.81 |
| 分期组 | 44 | 103.67±20.59 | 60.96±19.38 | 19.90±6.11 | 36.87±7.36 | 6.03±1.34 |
| t值 | 5.004 | 0.655 | 0.926 | 4.151 | 7.477 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | 0.515 | 0.357 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
表3 2组纵隔子宫伴子宫肌瘤患者的术后子宫肌层愈合情况比较Table 3 Comparison of postoperative uterine myometrial healing between two groups of patients with mediastinal uterus and uterine fibroids [n(%)] |
| 组 别 | n | 术后1个月 | 术后3个月 | 术后6个月 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 同期组 | 43 | 16(37.21) | 18(41.86) | 9(20.93) |
| 分期组 | 44 | 5(11.36) | 20(45.45) | 19(43.18) |
| χ 2值 | 7.933 | 0.114 | 4.933 | |
| P值 | 0.005 | 0.735 | 0.026 |
表4 2组子宫内膜及内膜下血流参数比较Table 4 Comparison of endometrial and subendometrial blood flow parameters between two groups ( |
| 血流参数 | 组别 | n | 术前/% | 术后1个月/% | 术后3个月/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 子宫内膜VFI | 同期组 | 43 | 4.52±0.81 | 5.11±0.83 | 5.50±0.94 |
| 分期组 | 44 | 4.60±0.79 | 5.07±0.80 | 5.42±0.86 | |
| 子宫内膜FI | 同期组 | 43 | 23.98±4.11 | 27.40±3.56 | 30.67±3.90 |
| 分期组 | 44 | 24.25±4.36 | 28.15±3.29 | 31.00±3.58 | |
| 子宫内膜VI | 同期组 | 43 | 15.79±2.60 | 18.05±2.84 | 20.66±3.30 |
| 分期组 | 44 | 16.04±2.87 | 18.11±2.99 | 21.07±3.52 | |
| 子宫内膜下VFI | 同期组 | 43 | 7.33±1.30 | 10.62±1.39 | 13.55±1.47 |
| 分期组 | 44 | 7.50±1.19 | 10.95±1.44 | 13.32±1.58 | |
| 子宫内膜下FI | 同期组 | 43 | 20.18±3.59 | 28.45±3.86 | 32.55±4.08 |
| 分期组 | 44 | 21.60±4.04 | 29.07±3.71 | 32.79±4.32 | |
| 子宫内膜下VI | 同期组 | 43 | 26.53±4.79 | 35.11±4.82 | 42.28±5.16 |
| 分期组 | 44 | 27.88±5.01 | 36.24±4.53 | 41.90±4.84 | |
| F1值 | F组间=0.527,F时间=0.438,F交互=0.385 | ||||
| P1值 | P组间=0.584,P时间=0.665,P交互=0.731 | ||||
| F2值 | F组间=0.684,F时间=0.859,F交互=0.692 | ||||
| P2值 | P组间=0.422,P时间=0.173,P交互=0.415 | ||||
| F3值 | F组间=0.458,F时间=0.847,F交互=0.623 | ||||
| P3值 | P组间=0.661,P时间=0.262,P交互=0.481 | ||||
| F4值 | F组间=0.325,F时间=0.857,F交互=0.516 | ||||
| P4值 | P组间=0.791,P时间=0.184,P交互=0.490 | ||||
| F5值 | F组间=0.473,F时间=0.864,F交互=0.589 | ||||
| P5值 | P组间=0.621,P时间=0.237,P交互=0.435 | ||||
| F6值 | F组间=0.434,F时间=0.711,F交互=0.518 | ||||
| P6值 | P组间=0.589,P时间=0.306,P交互=0.496 | ||||
| 注: F1与P1值、 F2与P2值、 F3与P3值、 F4与P4值、 F5与P5值、 F6与P6值分别为2组子宫内膜VFI、 子宫内膜FI、 子宫内膜VI、 子宫内膜下VFI、 子宫内膜下FI、 子宫内膜下VI比较的结果。 |
表5 2组纵隔子宫伴子宫肌瘤患者的子宫内膜厚度、生殖内分泌指标比较Table 5 Comparison of endometrial thickness and reproductive endocrine indicators between two groups of patients with mediastinal uterus and uterine fibroids ( |
| 指 标 | 组别 | n | 术前 | 术后1个月 | 术后3个月 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 子宫内膜厚度/mm | 同期组 | 43 | 5.22±1.49 | 5.34±1.06 | 5.60±1.18 |
| 分期组 | 44 | 5.35±1.62 | 5.48±0.91 | 5.49±1.25 | |
| E2/(pmol/L) | 同期组 | 43 | 279.59±16.93 | 282.06±18.57 | 280.57±17.28 |
| 分期组 | 44 | 280.25±17.40 | 285.74±20.19 | 283.90±19.33 | |
| LH/(U/L) | 同期组 | 43 | 12.80±2.56 | 12.96±2.64 | 13.18±2.84 |
| 分期组 | 44 | 13.04±2.78 | 13.15±2.90 | 13.27±2.67 | |
| FSH/(U/L) | 同期组 | 43 | 10.05±3.11 | 9.97±3.20 | 10.26±3.41 |
| 分期组 | 44 | 9.92±3.03 | 10.18±3.34 | 9.90±3.27 | |
| F1值 | F组间=0.428,F时间=0.475,F交互=0.369 | ||||
| P1值 | P组间=0.674,P时间=0.628,P交互=0.725 | ||||
| F2值 | F组间=0.492,F时间=0.405,F交互=0.437 | ||||
| P2值 | P组间=0.527,P时间=0.614,P交互=0.581 | ||||
| F3值 | F组间=0.511,F时间=0.438,F交互=0.467 | ||||
| P3值 | P组间=0.504,P时间=0.587,P交互=0.553 | ||||
| F4值 | F组间=0.423,F时间=0.316,F交互=0.427 | ||||
| P4值 | P组间=0.619,P时间=0.702,P交互=0.653 | ||||
| 注: F1与P1值、 F2与P2值、 F3与P3值、 F4与P4值分别为2组不同子宫内膜厚度、 E2水平、 LH水平、 FSH水平比较的结果。 |
表6 2组纵隔子宫伴子宫肌瘤患者的生殖转归情况比较Table 6 Comparison of reproductive outcomes between two groups of patients with mediastinal uterus and uterine fibroids [n (%)] |
| 组 别 | n | 自然受孕 | 辅助受孕 | 妊娠时间 | 妊娠结局 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 术后6个月 | 术后1年 | 妊娠丢失 | 早产 | 活产 | |||||
| 同期组 | 43 | 20(47) | 4(9) | 11(26) | 13(30) | 3(7) | 0(0) | 21(49) | |
| 分期组 | 44 | 16(36) | 1(2) | 2(5) | 15(34) | 2(5) | 1(2) | 14(32) | |
| χ 2值 | 0.923 | 0.898a | 7.572 | 0.148 | 0.001a | — | 2.620 | ||
| P值 | 0.337 | 0.343a | 0.006 | 0.700 | 0.979a | >0.999b | 0.106 | ||
| 注: a校正χ 2检验; bFisher确切概率法;—为无数据。 |
| [1] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [2] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [3] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [4] |
王嫦华, 高白, 王岩青, 等. 经阴道三维超声联合MRI对先天性子宫畸形的诊断价值[J]. 海南医学, 2022, 33(13): 1713-1716. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2022.13.022.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [5] |
To analyze the complications and outcome of mediastinal uterine pregnancy, and put forward targeted prevention and treatment measures.A total of 248 pregnant women with mediastinal uterus treated were enrolled from Jan 2015 to Dec 2018 in the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, China. The data, including complications of pregnancy, gestational weeks, mode of delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, placental condition and perinatal prognosis, were collected and analyzed.There were 12 cases with abnormal fetal position in the previous cesarean section. The total number of cases with abnormal fetal position was 99(49.75%). For women with abnormal fetal position during mediastinal uterine pregnancy, there was a significant increase in the incidence of placental abruption (<0.05). The average gestational age at termination of pregnancy was 37weeks. There were 55 cases (22.18%) of premature and 49 cases (19.75%) of premature rupture of membranes, including 29 cases of abnormal fetal position and premature rupture of membranes, mediastinal uterus preterm birth, premature rupture of membranes (<0.05). There were 13 cases (5.24%) of postpartum hemorrhage, natural birth without neonatal asphyxia, five cases (2.02%) of neonatal asphyxia, preterm birth, and 51 cases (20.56%) of placental adhesion. Of these, 37 cases were cesarean, 13 were spontaneous production, and 71 were fetal umbilical cord winding.The pregnancy induced spontaneous abortion, premature delivery, premature rupture of membranes and abnormal fetal position in mediastinal uterus are significantly higher than normal pregnancy. The complications during delivery are significantly higher than in normal pregnant women.Copyright © 2021 Zhang et al. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [6] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [7] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [8] |
Uterine fibroids are the most common tumors of the female reproductive tract, affecting up to 80% of women. Despite their heavy burden and high prevalence, available medical treatment options are limited and are offered to patients assuming equal responsiveness. These benign tumors are complex, originating from potentially diverse pathobiologic processes, yet they are all managed in a rather standardized symptom-oriented approach that does not take into account the underlying processes. With our increasing understanding of the interplay between genes, epigenetics, individual's lifestyle, and the environment in disease development, uterine fibroid management should be geared towards individualized preventive and treatment options. For example, it seems that some subsets of patients with fibroids also suffer from vitamin D deficiency, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, or other conditions. It is possible that these subsets may have different underlying processes and different responsiveness to different treatment options. Herein, we call for a futuristic paradigm shift of research to develop a new model to manage uterine fibroids with the treatment approach varying depending on the patient's perceived underlying processes as assessed by medical, social, family history, and relevant investigations. This is only possible through the collaboration of scientists, physicians, and funding agencies and with the help of our patients.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [9] |
王秀梅, 苗叶, 佟亚菲, 等. 不同宫腔镜技术对育龄期患者多发子宫肌瘤疗效及对性激素和妊娠结局影响[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2021, 29(5): 997-999. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2021.05.035.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [10] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [11] |
李晶, 张春莲, 方彩云. 腹腔镜与宫腔镜手术剔除子宫壁间肌瘤的价值对比[J]. 中国性科学, 2018, 27(4): 100-102. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1993.2018.04.031.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [12] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [13] |
许阡, 王祎祎, 张佟, 等. 子宫肌瘤剔除术后5个月腹膜播散性平滑肌瘤病一例[J]. 新医学, 2022, 53(9): 700-704. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9802.2022.09.016.
腹膜播散性平滑肌瘤病(LPD)是发生在盆腹腔的一种罕见的良性增殖性疾病, 多表现为平滑肌瘤结节弥散分布于盆腹腔腹膜、网膜、肠管、肠系膜、直肠子宫陷凹等位置。患者大多无明显特异性症状, 国内外多为个案报道。富于细胞型子宫平滑肌瘤是一种特殊类型的子宫肌瘤, 术后短时间内发生LPD的病例在国内外鲜有报道。该文报道1例子宫富于细胞型平滑肌瘤剔除术后5个月发生LPD的病例, 该患者短时间内LPD的结节生长至9 cm, 生长迅速, 极其罕见。该文通过文献复习LPD的发病机制、临床表现、诊断及治疗, 探讨其与富于细胞型子宫平滑肌瘤的关系, 总结该病例的诊疗经验。
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [14] |
买苗, 姬超, 张莉. 腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与宫腔镜子宫肌瘤电切术的应用效果比较[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复, 2021, 28(7): 862-865. DOI: 10.13455/j.cnki.cjcor.2021.07.24.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [15] |
赵玉婷, 黄晓武, 徐若男. 宫腔镜下子宫纵隔切除术后子宫形态重塑的特点及术后妊娠结局[J]. 中国医刊, 2022, 57(10): 1142-1147. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1070.2022.10.027.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [16] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [17] |
To demonstrate various types of longitudinal vaginal septa (LVS), their classification, and the surgical management of typical and unique morphologic conditions of LVS.Video presentation of clinical appearance and surgical techniques for treatment of LVS.University hospital and two private.Representative cases from 121 consecutive women treated from 2013 to 2018 with LVS as a part of complex uterovaginal malformations or in isolated forms with [1] typical morphologic configuration of LVS, [2] rarer variants, or [3] specific anatomic restrictions.Resection of LVS performed as a main surgical procedure in cases with didelphys and bicornuate uterus in symptomatic women and as a part of corrective surgery of complete septate uterus. The three main nonsuturing techniques used were speculoscopy and septum excision using three different electrosurgical modalities; speculoscopy with laparoscopic devices; and vaginoscopy with hysteroscopic instruments.Clinical appearance and suggested classification, feasibility of surgery, and perioperative and anatomic results in a short follow-up period (3 months).We identified distinct types of longitudinal vaginal septa. Considering clinical appearance, we suggest classification of LVS based on four main features: [2] completeness of vaginal division: partial and complete type; [2] the symmetricity: symmetric and asymmetric position (with dominant left and right side); [3] association with the cervix: merged and isolated forms; and [4] concomitant vaginal openings: normal, and narrow openings: vaginal stenosis and hymen persistent (Fig. 1). Vaginoscopic techniques by hysteroscope were successful in atraumatic treatment of women with substantial anatomic restrictions, and all of the presented techniques can be effectively used for typical LVS. However, vessel-sealing systems allow for bloodless surgery in contrast with other methods. This study was based on previously acquired data during large prospective study approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent to participate in the prospective study and permit publishing anonymous data regarding the medical images, videos of procedures, and results was obtained from all patients.A new classification of longitudinal vaginal septum allows better characterization compared with the currently available classification systems. Different surgical modalities are discussed with their respective advantages and disadvantages. Vaginoscopic incision using resectoscope is a reasonable alternative for women with an intact hymen and vaginal stenosis. The impact of vaginal septum resection on obstetric, reproductive, and sexual outcomes should be assessed in randomized controlled trials and large well-designed studies.Copyright © 2020 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [18] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [19] |
赵子辰, 邓姗, 陈娜, 等. 宫腔镜下子宫纵隔切除术后生育结局分析[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2022, 38(3): 327-330. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2022030116.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [20] |
王维, 陈安平, 刘安, 等. 同期三镜联合手术与分期两镜手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效对比[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2020, 26(2): 23-27. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2020.02.005.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [21] |
胡学升, 李晓霞, 陈福佳. 同期手术与分期手术对结肠癌同时性肝转移患者生存时间及生存质量的影响[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2021, 24(2): 144-145, 154. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9905.2021.02.017.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [22] |
The aim of our retrospective study was to compare the performance of transvaginal sonography in relation to histologic diagnosis of samples obtained by hysteroscopy through analysis of data collected over 16 years. Data on suspected formation of endometrial polyp or submucosal fibroid found on ultrasound examination were extracted. The study included a total of 3679 women examined during the 2000-2015 period. All women underwent ultrasound examination preoperatively for better planning the type and scope of operation to be performed. The study included only women with samples for histopathologic analysis collected during the operation. Ultrasound diagnosis of polyps compared with histology showed 89.6% sensitivity and 39.1% specificity. For submucosal myomas, sensitivity was 69.2% and specificity 91.3%. In conclusion, ultrasound is not reliable method for definitive diagnosis but it is an excellent orientation method.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [23] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| [24] |
Hypermenorrhea is characterized by excessive menstrual bleeding that causes severe anemia and interferes with everyday life. This condition can restrict women's social activities and decrease their quality of life. Microwave endometrial ablation (MEA) using a 2.45-GHz energy source is a minimally invasive alternative to conventional hysterectomy for treating hypermenorrhea that is resistant to conservative treatment, triggered by systemic disease or medications, or caused by uterine myomas and fibrosis. The popularity of MEA has increased worldwide. Although MEA can safely and effectively treat submucous myomas, some patients may still experience recurrent hypermenorrhea postoperatively and may require additional treatment.To investigate the efficacy of MEA combined with transcervical resection (TCR).Participants underwent cervical and endometrial evaluations. Magnetic resonance imaging and hysteroscopy were performed to evaluate the size and location of the myomas. TCR was performed before MEA using a hystero-resectoscope. MEA was performed using transabdominal ultrasound. The variables included operation time, number of ablation cycles, length of hospital stay, and visual analog scale cores for hypermenorrhea, dysmenorrhea, and treatment satisfaction at 3 and 6 mo postoperatively. The postoperative incidence of amenorrhea, changes in hemoglobin concentrations, and MEA-related complications were evaluated.A total of 34 women underwent a combination of MEA and TCR during the study period. Two patients were excluded from the study as their histopathological tests identified uterine malignancies (uterine sarcoma and endometrial cancer). The 32 eligible women (6 nulliparous, 26 multiparous) had a mean age of 45.2 ± 4.3 years (range: 36-52 years). Patients reported very severe hypermenorrhea (10/10 points on the visual analog scale) before the procedure. However, after the procedure, the hypermenorrhea scores decreased to 1.2 ± 1.3 and 0.9 ± 1.3 at 3 and 6 mo, respectively (< 0.001). The mean follow-up duration was 33.8 ± 16.8 mo. Although 10 women (31.3%) developed amenorrhea during this period, none experienced a recurrence of hypermenorrhea. No surgical complications were observed.Reducing the size of uterine myomas by combining MEA and TCR can safely and effectively treat hypermenorrhea in patients with submucous myomas.©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
| {{custom_ref.label}} |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
PDF(1294 KB)
表1 2组纵隔子宫伴子宫肌瘤患者的基线资料比较
表2 2组纵隔子宫伴子宫肌瘤患者的手术情况比较
表3 2组纵隔子宫伴子宫肌瘤患者的术后子宫肌层愈合情况比较
表4 2组子宫内膜及内膜下血流参数比较
表5 2组纵隔子宫伴子宫肌瘤患者的子宫内膜厚度、生殖内分泌指标比较
表6 2组纵隔子宫伴子宫肌瘤患者的生殖转归情况比较/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |